Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Raj Thackeray - a boon in disguise?

I totally agree with Raj's Views but do not agree at all with the ways he is using to implement them. remember raj fought for the 800 misplaced jet crews. where 650 of them were north indians. he is fighting for youth. I m just a local marathi boy.i know the ground reality. the menace from people from bihar and UP has reached up to the neck now. although violence i snot justified by anyone. but his speeches and talks for preserving the marathi culture is very influential. what uddhav should do is forget the political obligation with BJP and join raj in this fight for marathi cause(not take up violence)if uddhav has to set himself up in the stature of bal thackeray. get the DF government down and then do it the right way. this problem has occurred on first place only because the government failed to notice the discontent among marathi people for long. not to forget the media bias going around. r we looking at a arushi case like situation here? where media had already given the judgment against her father and he was set free in 50 days. i see hindi news channel airing like anything and everythig "GOONDA RAJ","RAK ki tanashahi" and much more. shouldnt they just report whats going on rather than making judgements just because they have high viewership in north india. as far unruly state is concerned. do u really think all the thousands of people protesting on streets are MNS workers? no they r not. the common marathi man has also come out in his support. take this. today three people were killed in violence in kalyan(the center place of all the activities). 2 bihari and 1 marathi in clashes ( not that i m justifying the kilings). now take this 12 biharis were killed in bihar alone by fellow biharis today itself in protest against raj. now which one is the unruly state?
I AM EXPECTING LOTS OF NASTY COMMENTS ON THIS. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO POST THEM JUST REFRAIN FROM USING ANY ABUSIVE LANGUAGE.I M TOTALLY AGAINST THE THE VIOLENCE HE IS USING TO JUSTIFY HIS POINT.AND IF YOU ARE NOT A GOOGLE USER THEN PLEASE LEAVE YOUR EMAIL ID SO I CAN REVERT BACK OTHERWISE IT JUST SAYS ANONYMOUS.